EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 89 / No 3-4 (May-August 2009) Dairy Sci. Technol., 89 3-4 (2009) 363-385 References
Free Access
Issue
Dairy Sci. Technol.
Volume 89, Number 3-4, May-August 2009
1st IDF/INRA International Symposium on Minerals and Dairy Products
Page(s) 363 - 385
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/dst/2009018
Published online 29 May 2009
References of  Dairy Sci. Technol. 89 (2009) 363–385
  1. Ahmad S., Piot M., Rousseau F., Grongnet J.F., Gaucheron F., Physico-chemical changes in casein micelles of buffalo and cow milks as a function of alkalinization, Dairy Sci. Technol. 89 (to appear).
  2. Bacchin P., Aimar P., Field R.W., Critical and sustainable fluxes: theory experiments and applications, J. Membr. Sci. 281 (2006) 42–69 [CrossRef].
  3. Bégoin L., Rabiller-Baudry M., Chaufer B., Faille C., Blanpain-Avet P., Bénezech T., Doneva T.A., Methodology of analysis of a spiral wound module. Application to PES membrane of ultrafiltration of skimmed milk, Desalination 192 (2006) 40–53 [CrossRef].
  4. Bouzid H., Rabiller-Baudry M., Paugam L., Rousseau F., Derriche Z., Bettahar N.E., Impact of zeta potential and size of caseins as precursors of fouling deposit on limiting and critical fluxes in spiral ultrafiltration of modified skim milks, J. Membr. Sci. 314 (2008) 67–75 [CrossRef].
  5. CFM and ADEME, Inquiry: brake and bottlenecks for membrane diffusion in industry (2005) www.ademe.fr.
  6. Dalgleish D.G., Measurement of electrophoretic mobilities and zeta potentials of particles from milk using laser Doppler electrophoresis, J. Dairy Res. 51 (1984) 425–438 [CrossRef].
  7. Daufin G., René F., Aimar P., Les séparations par membrane dans les procédés de l'industrie alimentaire, Lavoisier, Paris, 1998.
  8. De Kruif C.G., Supra-aggregates of casein micelles as a prelude to coagulation, J. Dairy Sci. 81 (1998) 3019–3028.
  9. Delaunay D., Nettoyage éco-efficace de membranes planes et spirales d'ultrafiltration de lait écrémé. Approches physico-chimiques et hydrodynamiques concertées, Ph.D. Thesis, Université Rennes 1, France, 2007.
  10. Delaunay D., Rabiller-Baudry M., Gozálvez-Zafrilla J.M., Balannec B., Frappart M., Paugam L., Mapping of protein fouling by FTIR-ATR as experimental tool to study membrane fouling and fluid velocity profile in various geometries and validation by CFD simulation, Chem. Eng. Process 47 (2008) 1106–1117.
  11. Espinasse B., Bacchin P., Aimar P., On an experimental method to measure critical flux in ultrafiltration, Desalination 146 (2002) 91–96 [CrossRef].
  12. Field R.W., Wu D., Howell J.A., Gupta B.B., Critical 1 flux concept for microfiltration fouling, J. Membr. Sci. 100 (1995) 259–272 [CrossRef].
  13. Gésan-Guiziou G., Boyaval E., Daufin G., Critical stability conditions in crossflow microfiltration of skimmed milk: transition to irreversible deposition, J. Membr. Sci. 158 (1999) 211–222 [CrossRef].
  14. Gésan-Guiziou G., Jimenez A., Arcelin C., Cake properties in dead-end ultrafiltration of casein micelles: determination of critical operating conditions, Desalination 199 (2006) 20–22 [CrossRef].
  15. Horne D.S., Casein micelle structure: models and muddles, Curr. Opin. Coll. Interface Sci. 11 (2006) 148–153 [CrossRef].
  16. Huisman I.H., Vellenga E., Tragardh G., Tragardh C., The influence of the membrane zeta potential on the critical flux for crossflow microfiltration of particles suspension, J. Membr. Sci. 156 (1999) 153–158 [CrossRef].
  17. Jimenez-Lopez A.J.E., Leconte N., Dehainault O., Geneste C., Fromont L., Gésan-Guiziou G., Role of milk constituents on critical conditions and deposit structure in skim milk microfiltration (0.1 $\mu $m), Sep. Purif. Technol. 61 (2008) 33–43 [CrossRef].
  18. Le Berre O., Daufin G., Microfiltration (0.1 $\mu $m) of milk: effect of protein size and charge, J. Dairy Res. 65 (1998) 443–455 [CrossRef].
  19. Marchin S., Puteaux J.L., Pignon F., Léonil J., Effects of the environmental factors on the casein micelle structure studied by cryotransmission electron microscopy and small angle X-ray scattering/ultra-small angle X-ray scattering, J. Chem. Phys. 126 (2007) doi: 10.1063/1.2409933.
  20. Mekmene O., Le Graët Y., Gaucheron F., A model for predicting salt equilibria in milk and mineral-enriched milks, J. FoodChem. (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.02.039.
  21. Michalsky M.C., Michel F., Sainmont D., Briard V., Apparent zeta potential as a tool to assess mechanical damages to the milk fat globule membrane, Coll. Surf. B: Biointerfaces 23 (2001) 23–30 [CrossRef].
  22. Rabiller-Baudry M., Bégoin L., Delaunay D., Paugam L., Chaufer B., A dual approach of membrane cleaning based on physicochemistry and hydrodynamics. Application to PES membrane of dairy industry, Chem. Eng. Process 47 (2008) 267–275.
  23. Rabiller-Baudry M., Bouguen A., Lucas D., Chaufer B., Physico-chemical characterization of proteins by capillary electrophoresis, J. Chromatogr. B 706 (1998) 23–32 [CrossRef].
  24. Rabiller-Baudry M., Chaufer B., Specific adsorption of 1 phosphate ions on proteins evidenced by capillary electrophoresis and reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography, J. Chromatogr. B 753 (2001) 67–77 [CrossRef].
  25. Rabiller-BaudryM., Delaunay D., Paugam L., Pihlajamäki A., Nyström M., Complementary characterisations by streaming potential and FTIR-ATR of surface of virgin and fouled PES ultrafiltration membrane: What kind of information on fouling occurrence?, in: Szymczyk A. (Ed.), Surface Electrical Phenomena in Membranes and Microchannels, Transworld Research Network Editions, Kerala, India, 2008.
  26. Rabiller-Baudry M., Gésan-Guiziou G., Roldan-Calbo D., Beaulieu S., Michel F., Limiting flux in skimmed milk ultrafiltration: impact of electrostatic repulsion due to casein micelles, Desalination 175 (2005) 49–59 [CrossRef].
  27. Rabiller-BaudryM., Le Maux M., Chaufer B., Bégoin L., Characterisation of cleaned and fouled membrane by ATR-FTIR and EDX analysis coupled with SEM: application to UF of skimmed milk with a PES membrane, Desalination 146 (2002) 123–128 [CrossRef].
  28. Resmini P., Pellegrino L.,Andreini R., Prati F., Determinazione delle sieroproteine solubili del latte per HPLC (cromatographia liquida ad alta prestazione) in fase inversa, Sci. E. Technica Latterio-Casearia 40 (1989) 7–23.
  29. Schmidt D.G., Both P., Van Markwijk B.W., Buchheim W., The determination of size and molecular weight of casein micelles by means of light scattering and electron microscopy, Biochim. Biophys. Acta Prot. Struct. 365 (1974) 72–79.
  30. Van Leeuwen H.P., Duval J.F.L., Faradaic double layer depolarization in electrokinetics: Onsager relations and substrate limitations, J. Coll. Interface Sci. 309 (2007) 350–359 [CrossRef].
  31. Vourch M., Balannec B., Chaufer B., Dorange G., Nanofiltration and reverse osmosis of model process waters from the dairy industry to produce water for reuse, Desalination 172 (2005) 245–256 [CrossRef].
  32. Wu D., Howell J.A., Field W.R., Critical flux measurement for model colloids, J. Membr. Sci. 152 (1999) 89–98 [CrossRef].
  33. Youravong W., Grandison A.S., Lewis M.J., The effect of physico-chemical changes on critical flux of skimmed milk ultrafiltration, Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 24 (2002) 929–939.
  34. Youravong W., Grandison A.S., Lewis M.J., Effect of hydrodynamic and physico-chemical changes on critical flux of milk protein suspensions, J. Dairy Res. 69 (2002) 443–455 [PubMed].
  35. Youravong W., Lewis M.J., Grandisons A.S., Critical flux in ultrafiltration of skimmed milk, Trans. IChemE, part C 81 (2003) 303–308.